Control: tag -1 + confirmed On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:53:21 -0400, paulow...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> > - the blhc messages are the same > > I tried it out using ebview 0.3.6.2-1.4 and blhc version > 0.04+20140813+gitac2b8ce-1: > > ebview 0.3.6.2-1.4 without the patch: > > $ blhc ebview_0.3.6.2-1.4_i386.build > CPPFLAGS missing (-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2): cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong > -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -o > /tmp/ebview-0.3.6.2/src/ebview-client /tmp/ebview-0.3.6.2/src/ebview-client.c > LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,relro): cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -Wall -o /tmp/ebview-0.3.6.2/src/ebview-client > /tmp/ebview-0.3.6.2/src/ebview-client.c > CPPFLAGS missing (-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2): cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong > -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -o > /tmp/ebview-0.3.6.2/src/ebview-client /tmp/ebview-0.3.6.2/src/ebview-client.c > LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,relro): cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -Wall -o /tmp/ebview-0.3.6.2/src/ebview-client > /tmp/ebview-0.3.6.2/src/ebview-client.c > > ebview 0.3.6.2-1.4 with patch: > > $ blhc ebview_0.3.6.2-1.4p7764251_i386.build > (no output) > > What output are you seeing from blhc? I tried again, and -- oops! -- I got the same results as you. Seems I made a mistake the last time, sorry. So yes, this patch works and makes sense. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: JBO: Rache!
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
