On 28/07/15 23:23, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hello release team. > > We are not at a point where it makes sense to switch the default ruby > in unstable. I have been running it on my work machine for a few weeks > and didn't notice any problems worth postponing this any longer. > > After that is done, the following packages will need to be binNMUed: > > hyperestraier > libguestfs > mapserver > marisa > ngraph-gtk > notmuch > obexftp > player > qdbm > qtruby > raspell > redland-bindings > remctl > root-system > rrdtool > rubyluabridge > stfl > vim > xmms2 > > These packages FTBFS and we will need to look at them individually: > > korundum > kross-interpreters > subversion > treil > uwsgi > zeroc-ice > weechat > > the remaining packages are ruby libraries who are either not ported or > have build problems, and it is OK to have them removed from testing for > now. > > Please let me know if it's OK to go forward with this, i.e. uploading > ruby-defaults to unstable so that ruby2.2 becomes the default ruby.
Might be best to wait until after the libstdc++ transition. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
