On Sunday 26 July 2015 12:42:56 Michał Milanowski wrote: > Can't any debian dev see his stupidity regarding to this issue? There are > tons of qt4 apps that are widely used and will be probably never ported to > qt5, like Skype for example, but many others too.
Hi! I'm the Qt maintainer, and yes, I understand your arguments, but again: do you really want to push dead-upstream code and support it trough the whole life of Stretch? I don't. > You decided to drop support for them just like that (90% actually used > linux apps) and you are providing the only solution "Port your app to qt5". Or someone to step up and become a sni-qt upstream, fix it's bugs and we can reconsider. > All workarounds decrived here look like a joke, not real solution. Yes, sadly they failed to me too :( > Ubuntu provided this patch, Arch provided too. Every known distro has > workaround built in by patching qt to make their users live easier. But not > Debian. For the reasons I have already stated. > Shame and f.... you (sorry!). That was definitely too much. Please refrain from that kind of comments in the future. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
