On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:07:43 Loic Dachary wrote: > Without integration tests, linking Ceph against the wrong jerasure version > may lead to data loss. Prior to publishing a Ceph version, various > integration tests run to verify encoding / decoding,
Those check are part of post-build tests, right? While I was maintaining Ceph I've made changes to run unit tests but James reverted it as well. :( > this is the main incentive to have jerasure as part of Ceph. I'm sure Thomas can enable optimisations in jerasure library. > The other reason is that > jerasure can be optimized for SIMD instructions (ARM / INTEL) and not > doing so significantly impacts performances. Once again, this seems to be an improvement suggestion for libjerasure rather than argument against using system library. -- All the best, Dmitry Smirnov. --- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
