On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 07:09:11AM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote: > Steve: > > > That is too kludgy and speculative for my taste. Can you test it by > > building > > ActiViz on arm64 with this patch? > > Is that "activiz.net"? That package Build-Depends on mono, both > directly and through mummy, and there's no sign of anybody porting > mono to arm64. Do you think it could be hacked to build without mono? > Would it be a particularly good test of gccxml?
I suggested activiz.net because Mathieu had mentioned it in this bug thread. I expect it would be a good test of gccxml. But insighttoolkit is also a good test. I can't recall what wrapping is enabled, but did you successfully run the ITK test suite of python wrapping? Of the others on your list: do they make much use of gccxml output? Are there tests for that? -Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
