On Sun, 2015-06-07 at 14:09 -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: > Nikos, I am stumped here. Oh, wait -- what version of Guile? > 2.0.[0123] are broken. I've stopped choking on newer versions of 2.0.x that > I've not > seen, but history says that problems do sneak in in micro releases. > (Way back whenever, I personally verified each micro release before > I enabled it for AutoGen.) > So, what version, please? Probably *not* an issue, but just to know....
It is 2.0.11+1-9. > ======== time passes ========== > I finished reviewing every patch between v4-18-4 and v4.18.5 (I should learn > to > be consistent....). There are a few changes in the agen5 code, but every one > I looked at looked innocuous to me. Changing a copyright date or being more > scrupulous about stripping qualifiers from pointers. But I also pulled > support > for Guile 1.6. It's long enough in the tooth. That simplified a lot of the > Guile function wrappers. If there were a way for me to "bisect" the code and > pin down the issue, I'd do that. There were 22 patches, but many are simply > version bumps or strictly commentary. It would probably take 4 tries in any > case to find the failing patch. If it works for you, contact me directly and > I'll send my public key. Thanks! I tried to bisect myself but for some reason I'm not able to compile autogen from git. If you send me a public key I'll open you an account. regards, Nikos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
