On 05/13/2015 09:04 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> The issue is fixed in unstable (-9) in such a way that it won't >> resurface again if the control file is updated to build the udeb for >> even more architectures in the future. > > I suppose you mean 3ea68751abe4f3cf4c44a9695fff8742f80f43b4;
Yes. > but you're > actually backporting 41c7ecab07e1a26b78d81c250daa79ac53bd9ca0 which was > first shipped with debian/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4, (For posteriority:) No, that was actually the commit that introduced the problem because only the debian/control file was updated, and not debian/rules. The attached debdiff also updates debian/rules to fix the issue. 3ea68751 (part of -9 in unstable) also fixes the bug because it completely reworks debian/rules to not have an explicit list of architectures in debian/rules but rather now uses debhelper and *.install to take care of this - now only the list in debian/control needs to be updated (and there's a single place). The bug metadata is therefore correct (except for the fact that one could say that the bug is already found in -4; but since stable is on -8 and oldstable is way older, I don't see much point in dealing with this detail). >> Please review and consider this for the next Jessie point release. >> Ritesh would upload the package upon receiving your ACK. > > No objections from my point of view. Thanks! Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
