Hi, On Donnerstag, 30. April 2015, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > The documentation generated by javadoc includes a build dependent > timestamp. > > The attached patch tells javadoc to not include a timestamp in the > documentation.
while this works, javadoc should really be taught not to include those timestamps by default, so that individual packages don't have to be fixed. That said, according to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsInDocumentationGeneratedByJavadoc strip-nondeterminism should work around the issue too, anyone got an idea why this doesnt happen? cheers, Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
