Hi Michael, Michael Biebl wrote (14 Apr 2015 11:41:29 GMT) : > I therefor suggest, that libapparmor1 adds > * Build-Depends-Package: libapparmor-dev > to its symbols file.
> This way, we can simply make the Build-Depends on libapparmor-dev > versioned, indicating that we want a version which was moved to lib, and > get a proper versioned library dependency. Good catch, thanks! I didn't know about this symbols file feature. > Please consider applying the attached patch and making a new > experimental upload for libapparmor, so we can drop the hard-coded > library dependency. Sure, I'm always happy to help you folks when it comes to supporting AppArmor in systemd. Applied locally, building. Will test and upload to experimental shortly. > While looking at the symbols file, I also noticed, that it contains a > lot of versions including the debian revision 0ubuntu1. > Is that really intentional? I believe it may be helpful for collaborating on this package's maintenance with the Ubuntu folks working on AppArmor, by reducing our delta. But perhaps I'm missing something: to be honest I'm pretty much a newbie wrt. shared libraries packaging. Cheers, -- intrigeri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
