On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:09:10PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Just to make it clear: > > * You seem to be making the case that we have lost the ability to > produce (truly) LSB compliant binaries and the tech-ctte were not > fully informed about the true scope of the consequences of their > resolution.
No I am not making this case, because again, the CTTE referal is unrelated to libjpeg62. The CTTE did not statue on the removal of libjpeg62 from stable, ans so did not have to consider this issue, or any other. > * As it is, I currently consider this to be "end of topic" for me. > Short of the tech-ctte reopening the case, I am /not/ expecting to > reply to any further comments to this thread/topic. What I have been asking for is a rationale for removing a package that has been in stable for more than 15 years without any prior notice. So are you suggesting I request the CTTE to ask you to publish a rationale for the removal of libjpeg62 ? Cheers, Bill. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
