On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:49:32PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <e...@zhevny.com> wrote: > >> > I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org. > > > > Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ? > > I pondered that as well. But what if bursaries, front desk, etc want > to talk about summit specifically?
Then that's on -team? or those teams perhaps need a designated infra-liason? I don't know. > OTOH, what if we use something else > in a few years? You mean if the current re-org structure doesn't pan out? Then what about debconf-devel@ ? Surely DebConf will never evolve beyond having development needs. > > Who should make the request? I'll do it if you want and the listmasters > > accept new list requests from mere users. > > It probably makes most sense if tumbleweed and/or me make the request. > Or you do it and point to here once we know what we want/need. Either > way is fine. Ok. You seem to have a lot on your plate, and are some kind of manager or something, so I'll take it on. -edrz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
