On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:12:09PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:57:52PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote: > >If I read that correctly, #773412 fixed i386 on an i386 kernel. As you can > >see in the dumps above, i386 userland on an amd64 kernel receives a 32-bit > >field rather than 64-bit that patch wants. > > It's for 32-bit efivar/efibootmgr on 64-bit kernel with 32-bit UEFI > (which is why 32-bit efithings are used).
Let's see if I understand right: a) 32-bit efivar on 64-bit kernel on 32-bit UEFI receives 64-bit fields, b) 32-bit efivar on 64-bit kernel on 64-bit UEFI receives 32-bit fields, c) 64-bit efivar on 64-bit kernel on 64-bit UEFI receives 64-bit fields. a) is claimed in the patch from Dec 17, b) and c) come in dumps I quoted. -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
