On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:32:07AM +0100, Volker Grabsch wrote:
> I agree that the right solution is to:
> 
> (1) log invalid request names only on 400 ("Bad Request") responses

I don't know why do you think so.

> (2) make AWstats deal with at least these log lines
> 
> I'm aware that (2) is covered by #626185 and has been forwarded to
> upsteam.

No, #626185 is not about this.  It's about a very specific
case of "bad request"s.

> Unforunately, it hasn't been solved by upstream for more
> than 3.5 years.

You can send a patch anytime.

> Nevertheless, I'm glad to read that at least (1) will be solved in
> Debian/Jessie, leading to log entries such as:
> 
> ::1 - - [18/Jan/2015:14:43:27 +0300] "\x16\x03" 400 0 "-" "-"
> 
> Any chance that this behaviour will be backported to Debian/Wheezy?
> Do you believe it is worth the effort to escalate this to the apache2
> package?

This doesn't solve your issue, so I don't see reasons to escalate one.

> I'm very sorry for this, but at the time of that writing, #706076 was
> unarchived but still closed, so I was unable to extend to that report
> (with "reportbug").

Not need to use reportbug just for writting email, you can
do this and much more with usual mail client (MUA):
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/

> > > Install Apache, using just the default configuration
> >
> > It was too hard to specify which configuration you use or should I guess?
> 
> I wonder how this matches your appeal in #626185 to be polite and
> helpful.

Well, your answer was helpful, thank you.  The fact (how it looks in
your answer) that you consider other people as incompetent idiots...
Well, I can live with it, no problem.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to