On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:32:07AM +0100, Volker Grabsch wrote: > I agree that the right solution is to: > > (1) log invalid request names only on 400 ("Bad Request") responses
I don't know why do you think so. > (2) make AWstats deal with at least these log lines > > I'm aware that (2) is covered by #626185 and has been forwarded to > upsteam. No, #626185 is not about this. It's about a very specific case of "bad request"s. > Unforunately, it hasn't been solved by upstream for more > than 3.5 years. You can send a patch anytime. > Nevertheless, I'm glad to read that at least (1) will be solved in > Debian/Jessie, leading to log entries such as: > > ::1 - - [18/Jan/2015:14:43:27 +0300] "\x16\x03" 400 0 "-" "-" > > Any chance that this behaviour will be backported to Debian/Wheezy? > Do you believe it is worth the effort to escalate this to the apache2 > package? This doesn't solve your issue, so I don't see reasons to escalate one. > I'm very sorry for this, but at the time of that writing, #706076 was > unarchived but still closed, so I was unable to extend to that report > (with "reportbug"). Not need to use reportbug just for writting email, you can do this and much more with usual mail client (MUA): https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ > > > Install Apache, using just the default configuration > > > > It was too hard to specify which configuration you use or should I guess? > > I wonder how this matches your appeal in #626185 to be polite and > helpful. Well, your answer was helpful, thank you. The fact (how it looks in your answer) that you consider other people as incompetent idiots... Well, I can live with it, no problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org