On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:54:00 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst <[email protected]> wrote: > Op maandag 12 januari 2015 23:03:56 schreef Stephen Kitt: > > Done, I've uploaded binutils-mingw-w64 2+deb7u1 which produces > > binutils-mingw-w64{,-i686,x86-64} 2.22-8+deb7u2+2+deb7u1 (ugh, that's > > terrible, sorry...). > > Thanks, released now.
Thanks! > How do you plan to handle unstable and jessie? Good question, I've filed #775309 requesting binNMUs (the security issues are fixable by binNMUs in jessie-proposed-updates and unstable). While we're at it I believe binutils-avr, binutils-h8300-hms, binutils-m68hc1x, binutils-msp430, binutils-z80 and mingw32-binutils may be affected too... Would you like me to file bugs? binutils-z80 build-depends on binutils-source so it may be easy enough to fix, but the others have their own copy of the binutils source (of varying vintages) so it won't be as straightforward. Regards, Stephen
pgpNhSTBzA85r.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
