Hi! Frank Küster [2005-12-11 13:27 +0100]: > >> Did you see Martin Pitt's "enhanced" patch - do both address the same > >> problems? > > > > The appendix removes the douplette Martin found, so yes. > > I looked at both, and it seems that Martin's does more. I'm speaking of > the patch attached to > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=342292;msg=136 > > It introduces limits.h and does the same we did for the xpdf patches at > the beginning of the year, namely change code that can be optimized away > by compilers.
... or cause an undefined integer overflow. > It seems to me that Martin Pitt's patch also has everything that yours > (Joey's) has As far as I can see, yes. > Am I correct that the other issues that Florian found are not addressed > by any patch yet, and have not yet been widely published? Should I > delay an upload to sid until this can be fixed, too? Hm, I'm not aware of any additional issues. Florian raised and explained why 'p = f1*f2; if (p/f1 != f2)' is flawed, so I updated the patch to not use it any more. Are there any additional issues I missed? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
