On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 02:57:20PM -0700, Matt Rechkemmer wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.21-6.2+deb7u2
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
> 
>    * What led up to the situation? I was attempting to use mutt's spam
>    detection to mass delete spam messages in mutt.  When header cache is
>    enabled, spam headers are never identified and tagged within mutt.
>    * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
>      ineffective)? I tested against mutt.org's version of mutt.  In that
>      version, mutt works as expected.  When I use the stable version in
>      wheezy, the spam detection fails.
>    * What was the outcome of this action? Spam headers are properly identified
>    and tagged.
>    * What outcome did you expect instead? Using Debian's version, mutt's spam
>    detection mechanism fails when header cache (set header_cache) is enabled.

Hi Matt,
can you also provide a mutt -v output of the mutt.org package that you compiled
yourself and where the spam detection works fine?

thanks!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to