On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 19:49:13 -0700 Bart Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote: > This could also be fixed by having bin_ulimit read back the actual limit > after a failure to set the hard limit and store that instead of keeping > the "desired" hard limit around and trying to change it again.
I think that would be preferable --- I noted after the last ulimit query (zsh-workers/33363, about a different implementation oddity) that this looked potentially confusing. pws -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
