On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:40:12PM +0200, demerphq wrote: > You are definitely my favourite person of the week. Thank you SO MUCH. I > stared at that source for hours looking for this, and I missed it every > time.
Yeah, I needed quite a few hours with gdb to find it. Code glaring wasn't working for me either :) > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 03:57:24PM +0200, demerphq wrote: > > > On 17 September 2014 07:52, Niko Tyni <nt...@debian.org> wrote: > > Finally found it. Can't see how it could have worked on big endian > > 64 bit HPUX either as csnappy_internal_userspace.h seems to define > > __LITTLE_ENDIAN there too. But never mind. > > > > Jarkko wasn't certain if we had made a 64 bit or 32 bit hpux big-endian > work, so I bet I was just wrong there. > > But, does this mean there is something else we need to fix? No, I expect it's fine now. The __hpux branch in csnappy_internal_userspace.h looks perfectly compatible with this to me. > Let me roll a new release and we can celebrate together a debian clean > build list. OK; I expect I or somebody else from the Debian Perl group will pull it in Debian quite quickly :) > This is really really awesome. Thank you again. I can't tell you how > pleased I am that this works on everything. Thank you for all your work on this stuff! -- Niko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
