On 2014-09-08 10:26:45 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Vincent Lefevre wrote... > > > On 2014-07-07 19:38:31 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > > Package: file > > > Version: 1:5.19-1+exp1 > > > > What is this 1:5.19-1+exp1 version? > > As the name suggests and the PTS confirms: experimental. > > > Please close this bug ASAP if you cannot reproduce it with 1:5.19-2. > > This is not present in sid (1:5.19-2) but the underlying problem > (#670006) still is. Whether this report here (#754119) is actually a > bug and how to deal with it still needs to be sorted out.
Why do you mention #670006 while this bug has been closed in June? If it is still present in sid, then this bug should be reopened, and marked as found in the latest sid package. > However, I have a feeling apt-listbugs does not act the way it should > when handling an experimental->sid upgrade. Here it was a sid->sid upgrade, and apt-listbugs mentioned a bug in experimental, but I wonder whether apt-listbugs could know in a reliable way whether the package was in experimental. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
