On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 01:00:00AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > /etc/init.d/schroot is currently declaring a "Should-Start" dependency > against lvm. The initscript has been renamed to lvm2 for quite sometimes > I guess (but still provides both lvm and lvm2)
OK. In that case this isn't a bug, but a wishlist item. If it's providing "lvm" then there isn't really a problem here; it's behaving backward-compatibly as designed. > But a problem occurs with systemd, the lvm2 package is only adding the > necessary symlink to mask the lvm2 LSB initscript. This makes think that > the lvm unit/initscript is missing. This is a bug in systemd which may affect many more packages since alternate Provides are not exactly uncommon. Is there a bug open for this? > The relation should probably be changed from lvm to lvm2 This is certainly true, and I'll look at doing this in due course. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
