Hi Bill, On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:25:18 +0200, Bill Allombert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:32:07PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > If you do try this, could you let me know if it also drops the > > > libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll dependency? > > > > I did it but it does not change the dependencies: > > I checked with your new package, and I still get a libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll > dependency. However, it seems to be linked with the use of gettimeofday(). > If I use ftime() instead of gettimeofday, the dependency disappears. > > Do you know something about it ?
Is this when building PARI? I suppose not, at least I didn't see
gettimeofday() being used there... (I'm asking because my libpari.dll doesn't
need libgcc.)
Anyway, regarding gettimeofday(), I don't see anything which would end up
requiring libgcc. Building the following program
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
struct timeval tv;
struct timezone tz;
if (!gettimeofday(&tv, &tz)) {
printf("%d\n", tv.tv_sec);
}
}
for both 32-bit and 64-bit targets produces a working executable which
doesn't require libgcc.
How are you using the results from gettimeofday() and ftime()?
If you build your code for a Linux-based target, do you end up with a
dependency on libgcc_s.so.1?
Regards,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
