Hi,
Am 22.06.2014 13:59, schrieb Thomas Liske:
The question if also 20-rpm should not be shipped in the Debian binary
package is a slightly different case as rpm is packaged for Debian --
probably mostly because it's a dependency of alien.
But I suspect that running rpm on a Debian system (if available)
doesn't help at all for finding to which package a binary belongs, so
it probably saves even more CPU cycles if 20-rpm is dropped from the
binary package, too. Then again, I don't know how exactly alien works,
so I'm not too sure about this. :-)
IMHO rpm should be kept as I'm knowing systems having (proprietary)
self-contained packages installed using rpm.
rpm should be kept, right.
But I tend to remove the 30-pacman script, since pacman (the package
manager) is not packaged for Debian.
Any other opinions?
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: [email protected]
[email protected]
*/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
