On Sun, 13 Jul 2014, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > I am, frankly, not at all concerned with binaries not compiled on Debian > at this point. Data point: Fedora uses a different symbol versioning > scheme for openssl, so openssl-linked binaries from there won't run on > Debian anyway. > > It's far more imperative to educate upstream (in general, not just openssl > – but them in particular) about the fact that adding versioning to their > libraries is a Very Good Idea which will save them (and, more to the point, > anybody using their code) a whole lot of hassle – as well as potential > security holes – if/when their ABI changes.
Meanwhile, we could try to get ever distro with a clue together, map the versioned symbol diffs that already exist, and see if we can come up with a plan to at least do downstream versioning in a compatible way. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
