The following patch seems to help. At least the test suite passes on both armel and armhf.
But I honestly don't know why... --- mongrel2-1.9.1.orig/src/task/asm.S +++ mongrel2-1.9.1/src/task/asm.S @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ #endif #endif -#if defined(__linux__) && defined(__arm__) +#if defined(__linux__) && defined(__arm__) && defined(__SOFTFP__) #define NEEDARMCONTEXT 1 #define SET setmcontext #define GET getmcontext --- mongrel2-1.9.1.orig/src/task/context.c +++ mongrel2-1.9.1/src/task/context.c @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ #endif #endif -#if defined(__linux__) && defined(__arm__) +#if defined(__linux__) && defined(__arm__) && defined(__SOFTFP__) #define NEEDSWAPCONTEXT #define NEEDARMMAKECONTEXT #endif --- mongrel2-1.9.1.orig/src/task/taskimpl.h +++ mongrel2-1.9.1/src/task/taskimpl.h @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ extern pid_t rfork_thread(int, void*, in # include "sparc-ucontext.h" #endif -#if defined(__arm__) +#if defined(__arm__) && defined(__SOFTFP__) int getmcontext(mcontext_t*); void setmcontext(const mcontext_t*); #define setcontext(u) setmcontext((void *)&((u)->uc_mcontext.arm_r0)) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
