Package: python-debianbts
Version: 1.11
Looks your example works as expected
```
for b in bugs:
print b.severity, b.bug_num, b.archived
....:
normal 592989 True
normal 623963 True
minor 574552 False
normal 601856 False
```
The first two bugs are already archived while the others are not.
Regarding the sorting according to bugnumbers, I think you have to
settle for either one, sortable according to bugnumber or severity. Do
you think the sorting according to bugnumber used more often than
sorting according severity? If yes, please let me know and we can maybe
work something out.
Cheers,
Basti
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64
Debian Release: jessie/sid
500 unstable ftp.de.debian.org
500 stable dl.google.com
1 experimental ftp.de.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
==============================-+-============
python (>= 2.5) | 2.7.6-2
python-support (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.15
python-soappy | 0.12.0-4
Package's Recommends field is empty.
Package's Suggests field is empty.
--
Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
