block 753373 by 753382 thanks Hi,
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:47:19AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > > I didn't receive a actual answer from doko on whether cpp-4.7 was also going > > to go away. > > > > I can package ucpp but it needs to go through NEW. Or I use a internal ucpp > > copy... > > > > Regards, > > > > Rene > > > > Reducing src:gcc-4.7 to just building cpp-4.7 sounds like a reasonable > alternative to removing src:gcc-4.7. I filed #753382 to be sure. I'd actually prefer to keep cpp-4.7 (that would mean basically indefinitely[1], though, so it's not a really good option.) Regards, Rene [1] I myself added --with-idlc-cpp to LO back then to support a system-"ucpp" and it supported /usr/bin/cpp(-4.7), too. Fedora switched back to ucpp when gcc 4.8 broke it and I kept cpp-4.7 so I am probably the only one who really does use /usr/bin/cpp-4.7 for idlc... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
