On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 03:17:54PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:23:40PM +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:41:09PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > so if I understand you correctly we need to find a patch similarly to
> > > the one of flamerobin to work around the gcc-4.9 problem? I admit I
> > > feel not competent to create such a patch. Any help would be welcome.
> >
> > Well, ideally gcc-4.9 will get fixed, but I'm not sure what sort of time
> > scale that's likely to happen in.
> >
> > Slightly less ideally, we'll find a good way to work around this in
> > wxwidgets3.0.
>
> OK, whatever happens first, please ping this bug if it is worth trying
> to rebuild the package.
I uploaded wxwidgets3.0 3.0.1-2 a short while ago with a workaround for
this GCC 4.9 bug, so versioning your wx BD(s) >= 3.0.1-2~ should do the
trick (if you backport to wheezy, you can drop the versioning as the
3.0.1-1 backport is unaffected since wheezy doesn't have GCC 4.9 as the
default compiler).
Cheers,
Olly
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
