On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 03:24:26PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi Hilmar and Brice, > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:59:06PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > In https://bugs.debian.org/743362 you requested me to include the > > provided biblatex module. I've included it and got now a bug report > > telling me that BIBINPUTS and the bibtex.path variable is ignored > > now. I told the submitter to remove your module and he reported that > > it solved the problem. > > > > Please be so kind to provide a new module fixing this regression. > > BIBINPUTS is not used by biber(1p), which is called instead of > bibtex(1) for latex documents using biblatex.
My biber (from Debian package 1.8-1) uses BIBINPUTS. I get this output when just asking for biblio.bib INFO - Found BibTeX data source 'foo/biblio.bib' > I guess, that Brice's document tries to use biblatex and bibtex at > the same time. I don't understand what this means :) > This may have worked without the plugin, since all > biblatex stuff was ignored, but fails once both packages are > analyzed. > > Brice, can you create a minimal example triggering your problem, > or at least sent the bib* related lines from your LaTeX files? Here's a tarball containing a .tex and a .bib in the foo subdirectory. This command from inside the extracted tarball BIBINPUTS=foo rubber -v -d bar works when your biblatex.py is not installed, but it fails when it's installed: 'biblio.bib' does not exist There were errors compiling bar. Note my latex file forces rubber to rerun biber when the bcf changed. Otherwise, I have to run rubber, run biber, and rerun rubber with -f. That may be related, but removing these rules doesn't solve the issue. Regards Brice
bib.tar.bz2
Description: Binary data
