Eduardo Chappa <cha...@gmx.com> writes: > I am also concerned that you are patching pith/mailview.c. Why is that the > case? Why is it necessary now and was not necessary before?
Thorsten, could you comment on why the patch touches pith/mailview? I don't completely understand what Eduardo means that it was not necessary before, but perhaps you have a better understanding? > Thank you for your message. Your patch is not really for Alpine, but for > the c-client library, as such, you should attempt to get it included in > it. The current library that Alpine uses (with a few minor modifications) > is located at > > https://github.com/jonabbey/panda-imap Asheesh, is there a reason the alpine pacakge does not depend on libc-client2007e, but instead includes the library in the alpine package? I can toss the relevent patch over to the uw-imap source pacakge (which includes the libc-client2007e binary package) if you want. Regards, Simon
pgpbgdqYkHyZH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
