Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> wrote: > Yes, and I think it was wrong that the bug was closed by an upload to > experimental instead of to unstable when there was nothing > experimental about it.
Daniel is just being extra careful, using experimental a bit more these days, to avoid the more discontentment (I don't think there's the need of explaining the background and history of his situation). It is my opinion that it isn't a good idea to point finger at him for the extra care to not break anything. As for supporting multiple init systems, I'd be pleased if the TC was expressing about it, and especially that it is the duty of maintainers to accept patches for them. So I'm all with you on that Steve. I just regret the course of events, and the fact that Daniel looked uncooperative, when I'm convinced that he is. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
