On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:35:19AM +0200, Christian Beier wrote:
> The comment says 'may' and to my knowledge the generic implementation
> certainly
> does not provide more features than the libnotify one. It really just is a
> simple window in the middle of the screen with icon and text.
A very quick poke at the source found me this behavioural difference in the
Show() method:
| @note When using native notifications in wxGTK, the timeout is ignored
| for the notifications with @c wxICON_WARNING or @c wxICON_ERROR
| flags, they always remain shown unless they're explicitly hidden by
| the user, i.e. behave as if Timeout_Auto were given.
That's an example of a feature we'd lose, though it's probably not going to
upset anyone. But it would be prudent to do a more thorough check.
> And the libnotify one, which IMO integrates far better with the desktop
> environment:
I'm not disputing that it integrates better.
Cheers,
Olly
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
