Hello, On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 19:04:45 +0400 Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 09.01.2014 10:53, Christian Balzer wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Meanwhile, we're at qemu 1.7, ceph is at 0.72, both in sid and > > wheezy-backports. > > > > I'd really, really would love to see RBD re-enabled by default for > > these and when things have trickled into jessie. > > I just removed librbd support in qemu once again, because the same old > issue - lack of library/symbol versioning - which prevented ceph from > going into wheezy - is _still_ not fixed. Because once I uploaded rbd- > enabled qemu, I received a new grave bugreport against qemu-system which > tells me that running qemu-system binary results in dynamic linker not > finding symbol rbd_aio_flush or some other. > Where is that NEW bug report? Would that be the OLD: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679686 you merged things with? > And now I need _really_ good reason to re-enable it again, because, well, > guys, this is not funny at all. > Firstly I am running 1.7.0+dfsg-6 under Jessie and it works just fine. As did source build versions with RBD enabled in the past, either by using the inktank Ceph packages or since 0.72.x entered sid and then jessie. Secondly, Bug 679686 is about something that is not true in Jessie, as it contains Ceph 0.72.2 (at this time). That version is not in wheezy-backports yet and for that particular case it would be true. However for Jessie it most emphatically isn't. If there is indeed a bug (new or still present) with jessie, fine. If this is about wheezy-backports, since when do backports block packages from entering testing? Lastly, I will make the Ceph developers aware of this. Regards, Christian -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer [email protected] Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications http://www.gol.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
