On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:51:46AM -0500, Ron Murray wrote: > > Sorry for the delay with this: it's been a busy couple of weeks here. > > I haven't had a chance to try the patch you suggested as yet. I will > try it in the next couple of days and let you know what happens.
There has been an updated patch: http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=14624 And I think I saw someone confirm that the previous patch fixed it for him. > The box is an Enterprise 250, with 2 x 400 MHz Ultrasparc II > processors. I could probably try building a uniprocessor kernel if you > think it'd help, but, again, that will have to wait for a day or two. I don't think that it being a dual processor actually has anything to do with it, more that it's probably easier to reproduce the problem on such machines. I've tried to reproduce this on vore which is an Ultrasparc II 300, single cpu, and didn't have a problem. Having no clue about sparc, I have no idea why the patch fixes anything, or why the code suddenly breaks while it hasn't changed. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
