On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:36:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:04:17 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > The Ruby maintainers want to make sure ruby1.9.1 is not included in > > Jessie. > > > > Different from the ruby1.8 transition, which was huge and is almost > > done, work on this one is just starting though it tends to be a lot > > smoother. > > > > We begin with ~140 packages in "bad" state, of which: > > > > - ~120 will be able to be fixed with binNMU's once ruby-defaults is > > updated to not pull ruby1.9.1 anymore. > > > > - ~20 seem to be explicitly (build-) depending on ruby1.9.1. We will > > investigate them individually, file bugs and when possible send > > patches. I don't expect this to be too much trouble, since packages > > that already work with ruby1.9.1 tend to not have problems with later > > versions. > > > Hi Antonio, > > I've now set up a tracker, my understanding is you don't need anything > else from us at least until ruby-defaults is switched. Yell if that's > not accurate.
Yeah, that's right. Thanks. -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
