Hi Andres, On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 01:56:30PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > I'm also interested in taking it. Perhaps we could comaintain it and > git-core? It's quite important for the kernel team (and others) to have > this package.
sure, let's see first whether we agree upon how the package(s) should look like. Here's what I plan to do: o split the package into git-core, cogito, and also split off gitk: source git-core with binary packages git-core, gitk; source cogito with binary package cogito o maybe split off git-cvs*, git-svn* also o don't link against openssl: set NO_OPENSSL, disable --merge-order in rev-list.c; link against libcurl3-gnutls (#321301) o fix depends and change some depends into recommends o complete repackaging without debhelper or any other build system, I usually use a simple collection of implicit Makefile rules for my packages o try to solve the git<->git conflict with gnu interactive tools, for now keep the name 'gt' for the git wrapper Packaging generally shouldn't be that hard, I'll prepare packages and post a link here, so you can take a look at it, ok? Regards, Gerrit. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
