Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > >> > This is strange; unless I find out that the woody and sarge files differ >> > only in that one line, I must suspect a script from some other package. >> >> woody didn't have the file at all - so there's no explanation left. > > > You are looking at the wrong place. > It's a sid->sid upgrade. > > You can compare current sarge/sid to get a good approximation > > $ grep dvipdfm tetex-base-2.0.2c/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg > # dvipdfmDownloadBase14 > # Should dvipdfm download the base 14 pdf fonts? Since some configurations > dvipdfmDownloadBase14 false > > $ grep dvipdf tex-common/tex-common-0.10/conf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg > # dvipdfmDownloadBase14 > # Should dvipdfm download the base 14 pdf fonts? Since some configurations > dvipdfmDownloadBase14 true
I know, but the point is that - in 2.0.2 in etch and sarge, all three download settings (for pdftex, dvips, and dvipdfm) are false, in sid all three are true, but in the file you had on your system, only one was true (or was it only one that was false? Doesn't matter). - We have already registered the md5sum for sarge's version to ucf. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
