Hi Stéphane, Quoting Stéphane Glondu (2014-03-06 13:41:53) > Why do you add libocp-indent-lib-ocaml as explicit dependency to ocp-indent? > Isn't the one inferred by dh_ocaml enough?
the one inferred by dh_ocaml is enough. That was some leftover cruft from when I did not yet know that dh_ocaml would do this kind of thing for me. > If you put META and $foo.cma in a runtime package, there should also be > $foo.cmxs there (on native architectures). Otherwise, not having a runtime > package at all is fine for pure OCaml libraries. > > There are no *.cmx files installed. Do you know if that's intentional? I patched (not pushed to git yet) upstream Makefile to also build and install cmxs and cmx files. I will ask upstream to integrate that patch into their next release. I dont remember from where I got the splitting into libocp-indent-lib-ocaml (with META and cma) and libocp-indent-lib-ocaml-dev (with all the rest) but now that I search for it I can see some packages which do it that way (for example libxen-ocaml or libatd-ocaml or libben-ocaml or libfindlib-ocaml). Are you also saying that I do not need to create the two packages libocp-indent-lib-ocaml and libocp-indent-lib-ocaml-dev but that only libocp-indent-lib-ocaml-dev with all the files is enough? From reading [1] it seems that splitting it into a lib and a dev package is only advised if a shared library is involved which is not the case here. cheers, josch [1] http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.html/c305.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
