Bob Proulx (me) wrote: > The original bug report was regarding sa-exim and greylisting. > ... > the bug should be reassigned to exim4 as an exim problem.
Adam D. Barratt wrote: > sa-exim isn't exim4; it's a separate package from a different upstream. Marco Gaiarin wrote: > No, it is not exim4 trouble, better a sa-exim trouble, but i think it > is generic, so robably other SA plugin (not only sa-exim) could trigger > that... Sorry. I misspoke saying exim4 when I should have said sa-exim. My bad. I had identified it correctly in an earlier message. Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
