2014-02-15 23:31 GMT+01:00 Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org>:
> Am 15.02.2014 23:23, schrieb Bálint Réczey:
>> 2014-02-15 23:01 GMT+01:00 Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org>:
>>> The symbols file looks broken as well:
>>>
>>> libsigc-2.0.so.0 libsigc++-2.0-0c2a (>= 2.0.2)
>>>
>>> Why was the version hard-coded here instead of using #MINVER#?
>> I wanted to stay as close as possible to the meaning of the original
>> shlibs file:
>> dh_makeshlibs -a -V'libsigc++-2.0-$(SONAME) (>= 2.0.2)'
>>
>> I'm in the middle of preparing the fix, I'll upload it in half an hour.
>
> Sorry if that may come of as rude:
> Have you maintained library packages before? Do you know how symbols
> files work and how they are supposed to be used?
It is somewhat rude, but I kind of deserved it. :-)
Yes, I maintain some libs and I think 2.0.2 was a wrong value
originally and I should not have kept it.
I have retrurned to #MINVER# and also fixed the broken dependency.
I misinterpreted the relevant policy part and I thought setting an
exact value instead of the template
was a valid option.

Thanks,
Balint

>
> Michael
>
> --
> Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
> universe are pointed away from Earth?
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to