On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:33:44PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > So it's my understanding that it would be better that we use libv4l2 > and then replace calls like open() with v4l2_open(). The wrapper is > just there to fix broken applications. I can see no good reason why > we don't use the library itself instead.
It has been suggested that the library might be under the GPL and that that might be a reason to avoid it. But it's LGPL-2.1+, see http://bugs.debian.org/737901 Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
