Hi Michael, Michael Biebl <[email protected]> writes: > I'm a bit puzzled by that patch: > > Don't you need to mark the (optional) build-dependencies as such? > I don't see anything in the patch touch debian/control though. > > Could you elaborate how this is supposed to work? I looked at a couple of other patches before merging this, and the common theme was that the changes to debian/rules came first, and debian/control will be touched later. I think this is/was due to the fact that the debian/control changes were not standardized at the point. I am not sure about the current status, i.e. whether it’s safe/wise to change d/control yet.
-- Best regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
