On 2014-02-01 14:11, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > The state of openscenegraph itself isn't the problem here: what we're > waiting for is for simgear to clear NEW and for Release Team to give > official permission (britney hint??) to ignore openwalnut for now. >
Actually both of those things are FTP master decisions. If openwalnut had been in testing, then that part would need both FTP masters and the Release Team - but since it is not, then we just need the FTP masters approval for getting openscenegraph decrufted at the price of breaking openwalnut (even further). I can ask the FTP masters to process simgear - decrufting openscenegraph will have to wait until we have fixed all the packages that we can. > There is the separate question of whether you want an ~rc in an Ubuntu > LTS (14.04 freezes 20 Feb), but they finished their transition to > 3.2.0rc months ago (by removing openwalnut) and will sync from > experimental if you ask them to, so that isn't tied to what we do in > Debian. > > Based on Manuel's mail (not quoted here), I think I would prefer if we transitioned to openscenegraph ABI 99 rather than 100. In my eyes, it makes the whole thing simpler and means we can start working immediately - especially considering that our best guess on a release date for the new version is more than a week or two away (Manuel suggested March or later). ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
