Hi, Il 26/01/2014 03:17, Andreas Beckmann ha scritto: > On 2014-01-26 02:38, Adam Borowski wrote: >> [...] > > Thats weird. Did anything change in 3.13 w.r.t. to that symbol? Links to > some commits would be nice ...
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/515 should be the original patch removing EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_os_wait_events_complete) > [...] > >> As for the second problem Maurizio reported: I got no EFI system, nor a >> relevant laptop, so I can't reproduce. The original patch is enough for my >> system, as far as I can tell. Weird. My system is not EFI too, nevertheless it needs the additional patch. > At least the need for this patch I understand, thanks to the kernel commit. > > I would probably do something like > > #if !defined(OLDNAME) && defined(NEWNAME) > #define OLDNAME NEWNAME > #endif > > to stay backwards-compatible. > > BTW, this does not look correct: > > #ifdef FOO > #elif BAR // should be defined(BAR) instead > #endif Sorry for the bad quality of my patch, I'm definitely not a C programmer; I only wanted to share my experience just in case someone else will have to face that issue. Fedora guys are facing the same issue and are applying a patch (pls. see http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/rpms/nvidia-kmod/devel/nvidia_3.13_kernel.patch?hideattic=1&revision=1.3&root=nonfree&view=markup). The 1.2 version of that patch also includes a define for the missing DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE macro (removed in v1.3) which perfectly fixes all issues here. > Is there any discussion about kernel 3.313 with a response from nvidia > in the nvidia forum? Please see https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/644906/linux/331-20-on-3-13-rc1-kernel but no response from nvidia AFAICS. Thanks Maurizio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
