Hi, Sergei Golovan wrote (29 Sep 2013 22:07:34 GMT) : > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: >> Sergei Golovan <sgolo...@nes.ru> (2013-09-30): >>> I've uploaded this change to unstable (and it already hit testing). No >>> complains whatsoever. >> >> yes, I saw that, and that's nice. That doesn't buy us squeeze→wheezy >> upgrade testing, though, which is what we would like to avoid breaking >> or worsening.
> True. But as far as I see, the current situation with this upgrade is > far from perfect. It silently breaks expectk and packages which depend > on it. With conflict the user can choose whether to remove expectk or > to retain the old expect. My understanding is that this 1-year old proposed update will be blocked as long as no super-serious testing of its effect on the Squeeze->Wheezy upgrade is done. Does anyone here intend to do so at some point, or should we close this bug? Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
