On 13.01.2014 11:05, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:38:57AM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote: >> On 13.01.2014 02:13, Mike Hommey wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 05:37:38PM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote: >>>> Package: libnss3-dev >>>> Version: 2:3.15.3-1 >>>> Severity: wishlist >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I need these two files in the -dev package because libapache2-mod-rev >>>> build-depends on them. libapach2-mod-rev is a dependency of a Dogtag >>>> certificate server component. Dogtag 10.1.0 is now packaged with all the >>>> dependencies and I hope to get them in the archive by early January.. >>> >>> There is no libnssdb.a. There is libnssdbm.a, but there's no reason to >>> use it when there is libnssdbm3.so. Is libnssckfw.a enough? >> >> hah, looks like I've typoed it everywhere (other than debian/rules).. >> it's actually libnssb.a that I need in addition to libnssckfw.a. > > The contents of libnssb.a are in libnss3.so. Why do you need libnssb?
For an apache module called mod_rev.so, configure.in has: if ! test -e "$nss_lib_dir"/libnssb.a then AC_MSG_ERROR([NSS is installed but the PKCS11 development package is missing. Need libnssb.a]) fi preliminary packaging is in git if you would like to have a look: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-fedora-ds/libapache2-mod-rev.git -- t -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
