On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:05:59AM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > Alessandro Ghedini <[email protected]> writes: > > could you please remove valgrind from armel? It used to build there with a > > somewhat ugly hack (valgrind doesn't support armel baseline architecture), > > but > > it stopped doing so a couple months ago, and there doesn't seem to be much > > interest in armel valgrind from arm porters (nor from me FWIW). Also see > > #720409. > > There are still quite a lot of packages build-depending on valgrind:
I wonder if we could go ahead with this. Right now the only packages build
depending on valgrind on armel are jq (removed from testing) and abiword (fixed
in experimental). What do you think?
Cheers
--
perl -E '$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
