]] Dimitri John Ledkov > >> Fedora/RPM based distributions are significantly different, thus it is > >> inevitable that we'll have to maintain a fork of systemd for best > >> integration into Debian. This does not seem evident from the current > >> systemd maintainers, which file bugs to disable/remove/override debian > >> functionality and components with inferior systemd counterparts. > > > > Can you provide bug numbers for those allegations, please? > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;bug=716812
Not sure why you mention this. It's filed by a user, not anybody who's maintaining systemd. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719738 - udev "follow > upstream" change, granted, steps have later been taken back to > preserve backwards compat. Not sure how «please enable upstream functionality so lvm2 doesn't hold up the boot» becomes «disable/remove/override debian functionality with inferior systemd counterparts». Josh explains this pretty adequately in his mail. > I've downloaded systemd_204.orig.tar.gz from debian mirror - > 3ba441b51a390c6afc21e9a8a4811698 > And i've downloaded systemd-204.tar.xz from systemd upstream - > a07619bb19f48164fbf0761d12fd39a8 Ah, it seems like the last upload was done wrongly somehow. I'll see what we can do to fix that. As you can see if you browse your local mirror, there's a .tar.xz there too with a hash that matches upstream. Thanks for noticing this. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
