Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 01:43:59PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> I'm a bit surprised that you mention this only now, after Russ' >> extensive mail. Could you tell us if there are there other components in >> systemd that you think are similarly flawed, > > Why should it have been mentioned before now?
Socket activation seems to be considered one of the major new features that systemd brings to the table. You seem to think it's fundamentally flawed, and you're the maintainer of the upstart position statement, so I would have expected it to be mentioned there as an important point to be taken into account when making the decision. Best, Nikolaus -- Encrypted emails preferred. PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org