On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 17:24 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > * systemd synchronization support added via sd_notify. > * systemd socket activation support.
Does sd_notify() actually give any positive effect compared to just using type=simple, given that you already have socket activation? The UDP socket should buffer packets until the daemon reads them. Explicit notify does have the negative effect that depending services can not be started in parallel. Or do you want to support running it as a systemd service but without using socket activation (would seem rather pointless)? You ship a .socket file by default, so it doesn't explain the use of type=notify in the provided file at least. I think the .service file should have a Requires= on the socket to make the service fail in case the socket could not be opened (probably doesn't matter otherwise). There's a typo "mutli-user.target". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
