On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 06:16:41PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
>> here the configure script claims that f2c is added anyway:
>>
>> > [AC_MSG_RESULT(not found, trying to use -lf2c anyway.)]
>>
>> but then it does this (and the patch doesn't touch that line):
>>
>> > LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}"
>>
>> which should read (just like the in the BLAS test below)
>>
>> LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -lf2c"
>
> I tested the proposed "ugly_fix.patch" which leads to the following
> build log snippets:
>
> ...
> checking for gmp.h... yes
> checking for f77_alloc_ in -lf2c... no
> checking for f77_alloc in -lf2c... no
> checking for F77_ALLOC_ in -lf2c... no
> checking for F77_ALLOC in -lf2c... no
> checking for f_open in -lf2c... yes
> checking for daxpy_ in -lblas... yes
> checking for dlarnv_ in -llapack... yes
> ...
> ...
> Use internal F2C -- no
> ...
> ...
> /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -fstack-protector
> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security
> -I/usr/include/libxml2 -Wl,-z,relro -lgmp -lblas -llapack -larpack -lglpk -
> o libplfit.la error.lo gss.lo kolmogorov.lo lbfgs.lo options.lo plfit.lo
> zeta.lo -larpack -llapack -lblas -lf2c
> ...
> ...
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if
> debian/libigraph0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libigraph.so.0.0.0 was not linked
> against libf2c.so.2 (it uses none of the library's symbols)
> ...
>
>
> Perhaps I missunderstood the whole problem of this bug report.
>
> Are there any test cases to run to verify the correctness of the
> package?
The correct patch seems to be described here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702882#52
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
